David may be out of the office but surely he forgot I still have the key. So, now that I have free reign of the place I’m going to rummage through his medicine cabinet, raid the fridge and probably throw a party until the cops show up. Well, at least my best blogger equivalency of doing so by jumping in to the media vs. blogger debate. Sorry for the mess DD.
It’s pretty evident at this point that both bloggers and main stream media are going to lock horns from time to time. It’s not going to go away, especially with sports blogs. I’m not the first to address the issue and I won’t be the last. So those of you with an interest in such things may want to break out the bookmarks because you will be revisiting them for some time to come I suspect.
The most recent dust up with the media is over at Milehighhockey and specifically with local radio host and Altitude Sports post game commenter Sandy Clough. It all started here, which led Joe to post this, which led to an email exchange with commenter and Tyler Arnson apologist “thedoctor”, and finally to this latest post by Joe at Milehighhockey.
Sandy has done what a lot of main stream media commentators have done. The responses on the blogs are pretty wide spread but I really like what “Girl with a Puck” had to say on the topic. I’ve got news for some of the old school media, blogs are not going away. In fact, not only are blogs becoming more popular but they are gaining greater access and credibility throughout the news reporting world.
In fact, the center of the hockey universe ran a piece on blogs and how important they are becoming to hockey media. Heck, this blog along with others contributed on a feature for the New York Times website. Both Tom Benjamin and James Mirtle make excellent comments on the subject, ones I find hard to argue with. I agree with Tom when he says that, “The blogosphere can’t replace the mainstream media. We can only complement it.” Let’s face it, a lot of the Avalanche blogs consist of working adults who are unabashed fans of their team. Mainstream media has an obligation to be neutral and “objective” in their approach to reporting. That’s a huge difference and one that mainstream media has a hard time with, especially when it comes to press passes and things of that sort.
We are lucky in Denver to have some fantastic local coverage of Avalanche hockey. We are fortunate to have media that are not only passionate about the sport of hockey but in most cases a vast history of experience with hockey in Denver going back to the Colorado Rockies. Not all hockey markets can make that claim. I hope that as time goes on that blogs and media in Denver can compliment each other and improve hockey coverage together. It all starts with blogs gaining trust. We do that my citing our sources. Adrian Dater deserves a link when he reports that Forsberg’s visa is approved. He worked hard to report on that and responsible bloggers will link traffic back to the Denver Post. We do it by posting corrections, not deleting mistakes. We do it by leaving archives of our posts available for readers to see. Last, we do it over time. Trust has to be earned and I think many Avalanche blogs are slowly gaining that trust. If our mainstream media can have an open mind about what bloggers can do, then I think we can make the whole Avalanche community a better place.







Nice summation Dario. Interesting point about the main stream media journalists needing to be neutral and objective. Yet the folks at Altitude work for the same man that owns the Avs. Funny, and we all know what a homer McNab is (not that we don’t love him for it to a degree), but after his interview with Forsberg during the Canuck game the other night, he actually said something to the effect that “all of us Avalanche fans” were glad to see him back. I’m not sure what the exact words were but yes, he called himself an Av fan. Not that we didn’t know it anyway, but I think that is a no no amongst the mainstream community.
Any beers in the fridge?
The topic has indeed been revisited time and time again. A lot of bloggers felt a need to come out and say why they blogged and to differentiate themselves from the MSM by indicating that they were looking, mainly, to provide fan perspective. It’s a huge debate that will continue on, but I really liked what Brian Burke had to say when he indicated that it’s a changing landscape. I’m not sure Ted Leonsis, in all his pro-blogger activism, is exactly right in his approach, but I’m thinking that he might have part of it right: taking hockey to the net just might be another way to help the game grow in popularity… and who doesn’t want that to happen?
Grat Work Dario, I think you’ve provided a nice closing summary for this latest skirmish. No doubt there will be more, but you’ve summed up points rather nicely.
It’s Monday night and I’m on the last leg of my trip home. I’ve got a bit of a layover here in Charlotte, so figured I’d take the opportunity to catch up on the Avs news (I’ve had no internet access until today, and the only news I’ve had was seeing the Smyth hit on Sportscenter). I see Svatos is injured as well. Sigh…
anyway, this media thing was blowing up just as I was leaving, and I look forward to catching up tomorrow morning when I have a little free time. Thanks for posting Dario (I look forward to reading that tomorrow and hopefully that will bring me up to speed).
and now that I’ve had a chance to catch up: that’s a great article, Dario!