<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final Grade: Ken Klee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inthecheapseats.com/final-grades/04-11-2007/final-grade-ken-klee/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/final-grades/04-11-2007/final-grade-ken-klee</link>
	<description>Your NHL 3rd jersey source (with some Colorado Avalanche stuff mixed in)</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Draft Dodger</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/final-grades/04-11-2007/final-grade-ken-klee#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>Draft Dodger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/185#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>"I agree that Klee was our best positional defenseman but Sauer would be a strong competitor for that title once he played with Clark (last 1/3 of the season)."

nice foreshadowing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I agree that Klee was our best positional defenseman but Sauer would be a strong competitor for that title once he played with Clark (last 1/3 of the season).&#8221;</p>
<p>nice foreshadowing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/final-grades/04-11-2007/final-grade-ken-klee#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/185#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>I agree with just about everything.  It's remarkable that he 102 minutes without a point on the PP.  He should have a hand full of points by accident as a second assist.  That more than anything tells you how much the Avs missed Leopold.

I agree that Klee was our best positional defenseman but Sauer would be a strong competitor for that title once he played with Clark (last 1/3 of the season).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with just about everything.  It&#8217;s remarkable that he 102 minutes without a point on the PP.  He should have a hand full of points by accident as a second assist.  That more than anything tells you how much the Avs missed Leopold.</p>
<p>I agree that Klee was our best positional defenseman but Sauer would be a strong competitor for that title once he played with Clark (last 1/3 of the season).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Lord Stanley</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/final-grades/04-11-2007/final-grade-ken-klee#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Lord Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/185#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>A very thorough analysis.

I think you're right that they'll re-sign Klee, but I don't think they should.  He'll be 36 next season and he's just not that great to keep on when the Avs could find a comparable D-man at the same price who can actually skate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very thorough analysis.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right that they&#8217;ll re-sign Klee, but I don&#8217;t think they should.  He&#8217;ll be 36 next season and he&#8217;s just not that great to keep on when the Avs could find a comparable D-man at the same price who can actually skate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin S.</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/final-grades/04-11-2007/final-grade-ken-klee#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/185#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>I agree. Good analysis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Good analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
