- Thank you, Brenden Morrow
- So THAT is what a PP looks like!
- Okay, it’s been fun, but no more Raycroft, please.
Personally, I’m leading towards #3, but either way the Avs won 5-4.
Personally, I’m leading towards #3, but either way the Avs won 5-4.
Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site.
Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.
You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
2008 (287)
2007 (284)
2006 (70)
I chose #2.
It had been so long since I’ve seen an effective powerplay that I’d thought it was an advantage for the other team, being able to ice the puck freely and all.
4. Prevent defense prevents you from winning?
I know I’m getting to biased against a player when I’m dissapointed that they scored. Nice goal Arny.
5. You’ll score 4 on us, but we’ll usually score more.
Yikes - Just because Raycroft is 2-0-0 doesn’t mean he’s playing better than Budaj, it merely means that the team plays a little better with him in the net. To me, that means the team really doesn’t care who the backstop is, they know they must score a gaggle of goals to get into the ‘W’ column.
I am all for #3. Let’s get our starting goalie back in the net. He did great as a backup, but this is his year to take the lead position. And the way things look the key word is TAKE the lead.