Courtesy David Zalobowski, AP Photo
“No! Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda, The Empire Strikes Back
For the most part, the Colorado Avalanche looked to be an improved team over their 2007 selves. Unfortunately, despite dominating many ares of the game, the Avs came up too short in the only category that mattered - the score. Boston took advantage of a late, fluky-bounce goal by David Krejci to spoil the Avs’ season opener, 5-4.
Overall, there were a lot of positives to take from the game. The Avs spent long amounts of time in the Boston zone, and at times had the puck so long it more resembled keep away than hockey. Our uniproned warriors seemed to constantly have two or three forwards buzzing around Boston goalie Tim Thomas, and the Avs outshot Boston in every period (and 39-20 in the game). The Avalanche defensemen also joined in the fun, pitching in 4 points and 7 shots. And, while I didn’t think our new gritty play was on display as much as some thought it might be, we did outhit the Bruins 34-20.
So, what went wrong?
Honestly, I think you could chalk up most of Boston’s goals to lucky bounces or great execution rather than defensive lapses or bad play by Peter Budaj. The Bruins did get some early breakaways, but Budaj came up big to save his teammates’ proverbial bacon. Phil Kessel (wearing his trademark shorts with an inseam ripped halfway to his crotch) scored the first Boston goal, and that one - coming when Joe Sakic was forced off the puck in the Avs zone - is really the only “bad” goal the Avs game up. Blake Wheeler took advantage of some gorgeous precision passing by Krejci and Chuck Kobasew to score the 2nd. Marc Savard got a fluky redirection-off-of-a-deflection on the 3rd. Michael Ryder ripped a one-timer from the slot for the 4th. And Krejci’s goal came off a missed shot by Kobasew; although Kobasew fanned mightily, the puck moved right to Krejci’s wheelhouse. It was the final nail in a coffin full of bad breaks.
The Avalanche powerplay seemed improved last night. The Avalanche converted on their first 5-on-4 of the season (on a great play by Liles and Stastny to set up Hejduk). They also came within about 10 seconds of matching 2007’s 5-on-3 output (of 1), but Wojtek Wolski’s goal (he centered the 2nd PP unit) came just after 2 Bruin penalties had expired. In less promising news, the Avs first goal came just a few seconds after a big breakaway by Patrice Bergeron, when Liles got forced off the puck along the boards and Sakic was unable to keep Bergeron in check at the point. Sakic had a great game offensively (7 shots) and defensively (63% faceoffs and numerous appearances deep in the zone to help out), but, plain and simple, he is a defensive liability when used on the point. You are going to see more shorthanded breakaways (or penalties to end the powerplay).
Sakic wasn’t the only guy coming back to help out. All night long, Avalanche forwards were getting back to help support the D - something that was missing last year. It seemed like any time a defensemen faced some pressure, he was easily able to dump it up the sideboards to a forward coming back to help. Last year, that puck ended up on the stick of the other team. I even noted Tyler Arnason getting back to lend support with 3 minutes to play in the game. Wow!
We didn’t win. There was a lot of “try”, but not quite enough “do”. But this still looks like a team capable of doing a lot of good things this year.
Lines
The lines were as had been reported on Wednesday (and, with the exception of Cody McLeod, were identical to the way I would have done it). I was a little nervous early in the 2nd when Tony Granato threw out a line of Tucker, Sakic and Smyth followed quickly by Stastny, Hejduk and Wolski. I’m not really sure why that happened, but they got back on track quickly. Granato even used pairs from the same line on the kill (Lappy and Guite, Hejduk and Stastny) which also helped keep the lines consistent. The first PP unit was Smyth, Stastny, Hejduk, Sakic and Liles. The 2nd unit was intriguing - Wojtek Wolski was at center! The unit was Svatos, Wolski, Tucker, Clark and Salei.
- Wolski, Sakic, Jones - 11 shots and 2 points for Sakic and Wolski. No shots for Jones, but he had 3 hits and had some okay shifts with the puck.
- Smyth, Stastny, Hejduk- 13 shots for the trio. Smyth looked great, although he had no points to show for it. Stastny made a great play on the Hejduk goal, and Hejduk (7 shots) looked excellent
- Tucker, Arnason, Svatos - Tucker seemed to be more on the receiving end of the physical play. Not much from this line (Svatos did have a helper like the assist machine that he is), but I wouldn’t abandon it yet.
- Guite, McLeod, Laperriere - Guite had a great defensive play early in the game, but that was cancelled out by a lapse by Lappy that led to a scoring chance. McLeod scored a goal at the end of a solid shift and Lappy gets kudos for challenging Zdeno Chara. 8 hits for the trio.
The defensive pairings looked good to me, although Salei and Leopold seemed to be a little confused together on several occasions. Even though Hannan had zero hits, I thought he and Liles were the most physical pair on the night.
- Clark, Foote
- Liles, Hannan
- Salei, Leopold
The game report can be found here.
Quick Hits
- The Avs’ ice time leader? Joe Sakic (22:36)
- The Avs had just 10 blocked shots to the Bruins 22
- Colorado won 55% of the draw
Random Musing
I’m a Def Leppard fan. Pyromania was the first, um, cassette I ever bought and I saw them in concert not too long ago. But last night was ridiculous - the band looked old and fat and sounded terrible. Now, I’m also old and fat and can’t sing a lick, but you don’t see me singing at any pregame shows, do you? And I certainly wouldn’t set the fucking Stanley Cup down upside-down on the stage. That was just brutally wrong, in so many ways.
Next Up
The Avalanche play the Oilers in Edmonton on Sunday.
Other Recaps
As always, your analysis is simply the best. I will be relying on you this year since I won’t be able to watch any of the games - so keep up your excellent work.
I’m not sure what to make of this team yet. The first two lines controlled the puck really well. It seems like Sakic should have had a couple of goals but Thomas stoned him. Jones seemed like he was on the verge of making good plays all night but for the huge reach of Chara. Tucker seems good at shooting the puck right in the chest of the goaltender and that 3rd line will need a lot of time to jell. I thought Clark, Liles and Leopold looked really good. But I thought Salei was making poor decisions all night.
I think with that pace and effort along with better luck and better play by the stay-at-home defensemen the Avs will be really fun to watch.
The local radio updates keep repeating, “Budaj only made 15 saves”. Shoot me now.
Yeah DD, Jones missed his shift in the second. I was holding my breath as I thought he might have had a concussion from the Chara boarding earlier or something.
Sorry, but 5 goals on 20 shots is pretty horrendous goaltending no matter the circumstance. It’s not like we were playing the ‘76 Canadians out there, it was the fricken Boston Bruins. I agree they were quality chances often set up by flukey plays, but still, a good goaltender makes at least 2 or 3 more saves out there and the Avs win.
Hopefully Budaj will rebound. But I thought he looked shaky at best out there. He was definitely the weakest link.
I think the Defense still needs to tighten up a bit. The puck just seemed to sit in the Avs crease all night. On the Pk they held Boston mostly to the outside, but they didn’t do that as well at even strength.
Good hustle, just not quite sound enough. I’m sure it’ll get better. IT really was a game of bounces, the B’s got them, the Avs didn’t. Thomas was just sharper than Boods.
The goal by Ryder was a let up by at least two Avs players. Liles seemed content to let Savard get the puck, it looked like he expected Savard to go around the net. Liles should have fought for the puck and taken Savard to the boards (IMHO) I think Wolski did the same, he let up as if expecting the puck to go around, and that allowed Ryder to be free and open for that quick little back pass from Savard.
Ha, I was telling my wife about the horrible Def Leppard cover band playing before the game on Vs. Then I realized that it WAS Def Leppard. Oh my…either Vs. must have been desperate for any band they could find or Def Leppard is desperate for any audience they can find. Or both.
The problem with Budaj is it too often seems he gives up a goal that’s a lucky bounce, then one on a deflection, then one on a good shot, then one that’s just a good play. Next thing you know he has let 4 by him. An NHL caliber goalie has to find a way to make those big saves to bail his team out and I just don’t see that enough with Budaj. On those 5 goals he gave up last night maybe only one could be considered a “bad goal”, but he needs to make a few big saves on the other 4 goals. I guess that’s how I see it.
Exactly, IJ. When you are making excuses for your goaltender it is never a good thing. I don’t remember too many nights of excuse making when we had 33 in goal. I remember other teams shaking their heads and looking to the rafters, but we weren’t looking for excuses.
PS: I love that Samuel L. Jackson video, even though Chelios is in it.
Lowayne:
Have you found the awesomeness that is myP2P.eu yet? You may be able to check out Avs games on the intrawebs…
Thanks jibble, it is more an issue of time. I am in an intensive grad school program and just the temptation of Avs viewing access will ruin me.
thank you very much, Lowayne!