<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avalanche Weekly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6</link>
	<description>Your NHL 3rd jersey source (with some Colorado Avalanche stuff mixed in)</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jibblescribbits</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jibblescribbits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Man, I cannot stand these ridiculous pom-pon wavers.&lt;/i&gt;

then go away</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Man, I cannot stand these ridiculous pom-pon wavers.</i></p>
<p>then go away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And yet he’s in the NHL.&lt;/i&gt;

Wow, yeah, because there's never been an NHL player who didn't have any hockey sense.

&lt;i&gt;Clark is worth every penny and I know a little something about hockey and playing defense.&lt;/i&gt;

Obviously, you don't.

The contract may take him through his prime years, but that doesn't mean it was a good idea to double his already grossly-inflated salary. 

Man, I cannot stand these ridiculous pom-pon wavers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And yet he’s in the NHL.</i></p>
<p>Wow, yeah, because there&#8217;s never been an NHL player who didn&#8217;t have any hockey sense.</p>
<p><i>Clark is worth every penny and I know a little something about hockey and playing defense.</i></p>
<p>Obviously, you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The contract may take him through his prime years, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it was a good idea to double his already grossly-inflated salary. </p>
<p>Man, I cannot stand these ridiculous pom-pon wavers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jibblescribbits</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>jibblescribbits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 21:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>mmmmmm Kool-aid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmmmm Kool-aid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1592</guid>
		<description>Clark is worth every penny and I know a little something about hockey and playing defense.  Surprisingly, I'm not livid.  That contract will take him through the prime years of a defender.  The only player that was "AWFUL" on that line was Karlis Skrastins.  And by Awful, I mean he was just mediocre but playing against first line talent so he looked awful.  Hopefully, he played hurt on a bad knee to get his record and he will be much better this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clark is worth every penny and I know a little something about hockey and playing defense.  Surprisingly, I&#8217;m not livid.  That contract will take him through the prime years of a defender.  The only player that was &#8220;AWFUL&#8221; on that line was Karlis Skrastins.  And by Awful, I mean he was just mediocre but playing against first line talent so he looked awful.  Hopefully, he played hurt on a bad knee to get his record and he will be much better this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>"Not so much as a modicum of hockey sense in his entire body."

And yet he's in the NHL.  He must be sleeping with the boss' daughter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not so much as a modicum of hockey sense in his entire body.&#8221;</p>
<p>And yet he&#8217;s in the NHL.  He must be sleeping with the boss&#8217; daughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Thompson</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1590</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1590</guid>
		<description>dra·mat·ic      /drəˈmætɪk/ [druh-mat-ik] 

–adjective 1. of or pertaining to the drama.  
2. employing the form or manner of the drama.  
3. characteristic of or appropriate to the drama, esp. in involving conflict or contrast; vivid; moving: dramatic colors; a dramatic speech.  
4. highly effective; striking: The silence following his impassioned speech was dramatic.  


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: 1580–90; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dra·mat·ic      /drəˈmætɪk/ [druh-mat-ik] </p>
<p>–adjective 1. of or pertaining to the drama.<br />
2. employing the form or manner of the drama.<br />
3. characteristic of or appropriate to the drama, esp. in involving conflict or contrast; vivid; moving: dramatic colors; a dramatic speech.<br />
4. highly effective; striking: The silence following his impassioned speech was dramatic.  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>[Origin: 1580–90;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draft Dodger</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>Draft Dodger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>by "dramatic" I meant "dramatic". really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by &#8220;dramatic&#8221; I meant &#8220;dramatic&#8221;. really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>If by "dramatic," you mean "accurate," then you might have a point.

Pretending that re-signing Clark at even his 06-07 salary (much less more than doubling it) was a good move is like pretending that JoeTed was a Vezina contender last season.

Brett Clark is fucking AWFUL. Very very bad defensively. Above average to good offensively. Not so much as a modicum of hockey sense in his entire body. Average skating. 

Giving him anything more than #6 minutes is a recipe for disaster. The guy is horrible. FG saw fit to give the worthless puke a raise, and you're drinking his Kool-Aid.

It's just like those Aebi Pom-Pon Squad idiots a couple years back. Just because he wears an Avs uni doesn't mean he's good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If by &#8220;dramatic,&#8221; you mean &#8220;accurate,&#8221; then you might have a point.</p>
<p>Pretending that re-signing Clark at even his 06-07 salary (much less more than doubling it) was a good move is like pretending that JoeTed was a Vezina contender last season.</p>
<p>Brett Clark is fucking AWFUL. Very very bad defensively. Above average to good offensively. Not so much as a modicum of hockey sense in his entire body. Average skating. </p>
<p>Giving him anything more than #6 minutes is a recipe for disaster. The guy is horrible. FG saw fit to give the worthless puke a raise, and you&#8217;re drinking his Kool-Aid.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just like those Aebi Pom-Pon Squad idiots a couple years back. Just because he wears an Avs uni doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draft Dodger</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>Draft Dodger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>stop being so dramatic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stop being so dramatic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://inthecheapseats.com/avs-notebook/09-04-2007/avalanche-weekly-6#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inthecheapseats.com/archives/281#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>People who actually watch the team play, have played themselves (especially defense), and know a little something about hockey are livid about the Clark overpayment.

Those who just look at the stats love the overpayment. 

It all just depends on which column you fall into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who actually watch the team play, have played themselves (especially defense), and know a little something about hockey are livid about the Clark overpayment.</p>
<p>Those who just look at the stats love the overpayment. </p>
<p>It all just depends on which column you fall into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
